Last Call for Sanity
Let's start with Bozian's performance. She began to lie the second her mouth started moving. Take this gem for example: "The public has been told over and over again that Marietta cannot afford any building expansion because the general fund is broke. This is false. Not one dime of general fund money would be spent to build a justice center or any building expansion." What Bozian completely failed to acknowledge is that General Fund money has already been spent on the Municipal Fortress of Vengeance. Bozian and all the other legal worms who try to invoke this argument, including and especially Council President and jurist Paul Bertram, should look on page 50 of the 2004 state audit report. That is where one will find that the city's General Fund spent $321,310 in 2004 on the project. Not only did the General Fund spend more than $300,000, but that money was spent during a year that auditors say the balance of the fund went from almost $3,000,000 down to barely $290,000.
Bozian did not deign to comment on the fact that the project has been atrociously managed since its inception. By now most people know that judge emeritus Milton Nuzum hired an architect that was not legally allowed to work on the Marietta project, nor on any other project anywhere in the country. As it is, the city has spent over $1,000,000 -half of it from the General Fund, Robin- with nothing to show for it but potential shame for the responsible parties. Nuzum and his disciples that still populate the court and City Council should be ashamed that they gave money to a fraudulent architect. Instead, those who should feel shame at the way they have managed the project seem to imply that because the project has been botched at every step thus far, thereby costing even more, it should go ahead.
The rest Bozian's arguments weren't based on a lie like the General Fund claim. The balance of her performance was the usual recital of how bad the current facility is. Bozian made no attempt to address the possibility of solutions other than a $5- or $6 million building. She did not mention that it was revealed in the Boyer-Halliday debate that the municipal court has the ability to and already does schedule some matters for the county's building. She did not mention the possibility of relocating the Mayor's staff to another building and renovating the existing one for a small fraction of the cost of a new building.
Bozian and the rest of her ilk believe in the promise of a new building and only a new building. They are, in fact, a very closed-minded group of people. Whether you think they are pursuing a new building out of personal reasons or for the greater good, it's undeniable that the proponents of a new building are completely unwilling and unable to consider different options. That's precisely why the moratorium should pass on Tuesday.
Another close-minded booby who performed at the debate was everyone's favorite head wound survivor- Tom Vokovic. At this point, yours truly assumes that Head Wound Harry has personally preached to everyone in town on the evils of performance audits. Preached to and lied to, that should read. It takes a bit more to parse his lies and distortions, but doing so is always worthwhile since his shabby management of the city's finances are key to this issue.
Here's one of Head Wound Harry's favorite distortions: "Twelve to fifteen cities from the entire state of Ohio contracted for a performance audit since the program began in 1998. The state paid the entire cost of the performance audit for all but three cities. Marietta would only be the fourth city in history to spend local tax dollars on the performance audit." The first thing to note is that Head Wound Harry doesn't know how many performance audits have been conducted statewide, even after he claims to have conducted exhaustive research into them. Second, the cities that did not have to pay for performance audits were deemed by the state to be in serious peril, usually from mismanagement by city officials.
Apparently Head Wound Harry believes that Marietta would be better served if he and his money management strategies, assisted by the criminal city auditor, were allowed to completely ruin the town's finances, because then the state would do a performance audit for free. Head Wound likes to paint himself as open to new ideas, but this is not one of them. Instead of being a city that takes charge of its own future by taking an innovative step (contracting for a performance audit instead of being forced to), Head Wound Harry, Brownshirt Shively and Turd Burnworth want Citizens to believe they have enough wisdom and financial management skills to do it all themselves.
(On a side note, Brownshirt Shively speaking for and invoking Junior Nolan at this week's Black Sabbath was priceless.)
Another tired excuse that Head Wound Harry uses is that the performance audit won't provide anything that Council can't do for themselves. Time and again Head Wound has said that since the state learned him how to build a financial forecast, that that part of a performance audit would be useless. What's really useless is Vukovic. He's talked for months and months about how a forecast is no big deal to create. But he's not managed to create one himself, even with the available brain trust of Fart Ordham, city auditor Gollum and other past and current geniuses of Marietta municipal money management.
Head Wound also claims that Council is perfectly able to determine what sorts of changes need to be made to better provide services. From that we can deduce that Vukovich believes that having city fire stations completely empty several times a week is a smart and good way to protect and serve. Another good idea is reducing the number of police officers on patrol, to the point where in inhibits their ability to protect and serve. Moreover, Vokovich also believes that lies should be told about 'out of control' overtime by the MPD and MFD, saying that it has drained the General Fund. Sorry- your humble narrator forgot that next year the MPD is scheduled to get CDBG money to start bike patrols. But even if so, where will the money for the bike patrols come from in 2008? Does Head Wound, in all his wisdom, expect to take a chunk out of the CDBG every year forever to cover the bike patrol? Or is it just possible that the budget for next year was just an attempt to make it look like Council understands that safety-services in town are stretched too thin, but not really do anything about it? After all, the city can't afford to hire more cops and firefighters because there's a $5,000,000 building to construct -and the lawyers on Council REALLY want that building. So if you feel that the current crop of city council members has been handling Marietta's finances in a smart and impartial way, don't vote for the performance audit.
However,
If you suspect that outside eyes could be helpful-
If you think that maybe, just maybe, Vukovic's main interest is not the commonwealth but helping cover up past misdeeds by Council while at the same time crippling the Mayor-
If you suspect that Vukovic and other past and current members of Council passed into law a 2005 budget that was based on a multi-million dollar lie-
If you think it's a possibility that Council is made up of a rogue's gallery of Marietta's worst (a cheating teacher, a hit and skipper, several imbeciles, a dingy lying poet who writes odes to his longtime companion and so on)-
Then you should vote for the performance audit.
It's been written in this space before, but is worth repeating: should either or both measures fail, the results will be disastrous for our once fair town. The forces of darkness and abject stupidity will then be emboldened. As such, it will surely come to pass that Marietta will get a free performance audit one day.
Good Luck!

